<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Trust on Byron DG — The Upstream</title><link>https://byrondgdev.com/tags/trust/</link><description>Recent content in Trust on Byron DG — The Upstream</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 22:03:16 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://byrondgdev.com/tags/trust/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Intent Engineering: Giving AI Agents Identity</title><link>https://byrondgdev.com/posts/intent-engineering-giving-agents-identity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://byrondgdev.com/posts/intent-engineering-giving-agents-identity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What if your AI agent forgot who it was every morning?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not its tools. Not its instructions. Those are easy to reload. I mean its judgment. The priorities it weighs when two valid options exist and the instructions don&amp;rsquo;t cover which one to pick. The instinct to escalate &lt;em&gt;this&lt;/em&gt; decision but handle &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; one quietly. The difference between a capable contractor and a trusted colleague.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s the problem I kept running into. I had agents that could do the work. They just didn&amp;rsquo;t know &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; work. Every session started from scratch, and every session I was re-explaining things that a human teammate would have absorbed in their first week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>